The MacBook Air, the 13” MacBook Pro, and the Mac mini are the first Macs to feature the new chip.Best Mac for video editing 2020 Which Mac should you buy to edit video: Mac Pro, iMac Pro, iMac, Mac mini, MacBook Pro or something else We look at the best.Mac video editing tool that was developed by Apple for iOS devices (including iPod touch, iPad Mini, iPad, and iPhone) and Mac. It’s easy to make content that feels like you with Premiere Pro.Rounding out 2020, Apple made the first move in its transition from Intel to Arm-based Apple silicon processors. Discover intuitive tools to composite clips, create transitions, and craft the videos of your dreams with ease. Premiere Pro is the ultimate video editing software for creating great video content fast.
![]() Mini For Video Editing 2015 Mac Mini Are![]() To call it the Bruce Lee of computers is no hyperbole. I was also interested to see whether more RAM or a beefier GPU would make that much of a difference.The M1 Mac mini is one of the best-performing small computers in this size or price range. So comparing “like” products doesn’t really seem valid either. Last year I tested the decked out Intel Mac mini and the M1 blows it out of the water. Of course, this is a base model M1 Mac mini and I’m comparing it against an iMac that costs five times as much, which might seem a bit unfair. I was curious whether or not these tests would validate that choice. I’m no expert on the engineering design, so take that assessment with a grain of salt however, based on my experience with the M1, it certainly feels close to being true.The 16-core Neural Engine should not be ignored, because it handles machine learning functions. If that’s true, then 8GB and 16GB would equate to 16GB and 32GB on an Intel-based Mac. Some have suggested that RAM on the M1 chip compares with double that amount due to efficiency. I presume that’s either an error or the way the CPU operates is different enough from the x86 architecture to make it a meaningless parameter.Apple gains a lot of efficiency from the SoC design, so 8GB of unified RAM outperforms RAM on a conventional computer. To compare purely based on numbers is misleading, which is why Apple has been silent about CPU clock speeds.I have seen it written that this is a 3.2GHz chip, yet one of the benchmarks I used identified it as 2.4GHz. Any non-native application runs under Rosetta2 emulation. To get the most out of the M1 chip, you need native applications that have been compiled for both Big Sur and the Apple silicon architecture. This ML processing is significantly faster on the M1 mini than my older MacBook Pro.The caveat is that this type of performance becomes evident with optimized software and media. One example is Pixelmator Pro’s Super Resolution algorithm to resample images during enlargement, which is accelerated by the Neural Engine. Quicken deluxe 2010 for macOptimized mediaMedia is a critical factor. Although that may only be the installer and not the component needed for REDCODE media itself. For example, RED’s Apple workflow installation requires Rosetta2. This isn’t just with applications. Both did well with this same test media. I also installed Resolve 17.1 Beta (native) and Premiere Pro (not native). But the same is true on my iMac. Moving this media around is like a hot knife through butter. ![]() Media was played from an external Glyph Thunderbolt 3 NVMe drive, which delivers comparable read/write times to the internal SSD. This announcement was made after my M1 tested was completed.) Performance testingI tested a variety of project types, both for playback and export times. 21 with public beta versions of Premiere Pro, Premiere Rush, and Audition. (Adobe launched native support for the M1 chipset on Dec. Obviously the combination of a non-native application with less-than-optimized media can be a challenge. My gut feeling is that the difference is largely due to the AMD GPU in the iMac, rather than CPU processing or the amount of RAM.The first test was my Holiday Cabaret project, which I described in my previous post. Sometimes by a little and other times by a lot. No surprise, the iMac had faster render times than the M1. The Glyph drive provided a testing constant.You can review the chart for the render times. But Resolve loves GPU power, so clearly the iMac showed a greater proportional difference in this test than the others. Granted, the software is still in public beta and you may see differences when the final version is released. The iMac handled all 44 layers well.The biggest difference in render times was with the commercial project in Resolve 17. The mini would play smoothly up to about 36 layers in Final Cut Pro using Best Performance, which actually outperformed the iMac Pro that I originally used to edit this project. There’s no reason that any FCP editor working in HD, 4K, or even higher resolutions wouldn’t be happy editing with the M1 Mac mini. Render times for After Effects were around 20 minutes, but Motion clocked in at a minute or less for a very similar composition!If you set aside render times and only judge by real-time playback performance using optimized media, then clearly the M1 Mac mini easily holds its own against a more expensive and theoretically more powerful Mac.Plus, it was whisper-quiet during all of my testing and never felt hot. This may be due to the Cycore plug-ins built into After Effects, which are rather long-in-the-tooth. However, the Motion export was exponentially faster on both Macs. While After Effects has never been praised as a fast nor efficient application, it is RAM-hungry, so I expected to see a large difference between the iMac and the Mac mini, due to the much larger amount of RAM in the iMac.The iMac was indeed faster, but only by a few minutes. Video plug-ins are a different issue. Adobe will soon release native versions of Lightroom and Photoshop.I tested Accusonus ERA4 audio plug-ins, which were fine. Apps like Pixelmator Pro, Affinity Photo, and Resolve 17.1 Beta are ready now. Some considerationsIf you purchase an M1-equipped Mac today, understand that many applications, utilities, plug-ins, and peripherals are still being optimized and tested by developers. The software drivers required to use that device may or may not be compatible with the M1 architecture or macOS Big Sur. Like other hardware peripherals, such as video and audio i/o hardware, you need to check with the manufacturer. FilmConvert does appear to work, but playback performance is affected.There’s been chatter about whether or not RAID arrays work with the M1 machines. For now, Color Finale 2 does not work at all.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorJustin ArchivesCategories |